3 ms·
I've been saying this about OS X for a long time. Apple is more mainstream than it used to be, but earlier in OS X's life, I saw the A and C groups that you spe
by peatmoss 12y ago
I've been saying this about OS X for a long time. Apple is more mainstream than it used to be, but earlier in OS X's life, I saw the A and C groups that you speak of. For a long while, OS X was a platform for grandmas and hackers.
I was an early PowerBook purchaser, because it immediately removed the need to dual boot for my job. I could run all my formerly NetBSD-hosted network sleuthing software and open the Word docs people sent (bonus: auto crossover Ethernet port meant never hunting for crossover cable).
By contrast, Windows had the power-user segment locked up. For a long while, it seemed that there were little utilities traded around forums to do all manner of things that I'd simply open a console to do on a *nix system. As a result, I always felt really unproficient on Windows systems, because I ended up trawling the webbernets for unfamiliar tools that had obnoxiously specific use cases.
- kijin 12y agoUntil recently, Windows has always been an OS for power users. It's incredibly configurable for a proprietary platform, perhaps even more so than some of the newer FOSS DEs. When I was younger, I used to have fun changing the text on the Start menu to "Fart" and turning the trash can into a toilet seat! The former involved editing the raw binary of explorer.exe, but there were GUI tools for doing just that. The latter was a piece of cake since I could do it with good ol' regedit. Even now, I think Windows 7 had the most power user-friendly DE ever to grace the Earth, and I look forward to KDE 5 since it looks like it might be a worthy replacement.