3 ms·
>Both parties save on time and fees. Of course it's good for the Googles and Facebooks, who have the resources to in-source teams to do the deals. But is it e
by hnnewguy 12y ago
>Both parties save on time and fees.
Of course it's good for the Googles and Facebooks, who have the resources to in-source teams to do the deals. But is it equally good for the small companies, the "acquired", the WhatsApps et al, to be relying on Google's in-house team? I'm not as sure.
I have to laugh at the "who needs bankers?" tone of the article, when the companies mentioned rely on ibanks to provide them with the talent pipeline they need to staff their in-house M&A teams.