3 ms·
From the title, I expected some evidence that the AI was better than an actual human. That's not the case. The comparison was AI transparent vs. AI posing as hu
by emiliobumachar 12y ago
From the title, I expected some evidence that the AI was better than an actual human. That's not the case. The comparison was AI transparent vs. AI posing as human.
The posing AI could be arbitrarily worse than an actual human and still be better than itself when not posing.
- lutusp 12y ago> From the title, I expected some evidence that the AI was better than an actual human. That's not the case. We don't know that. It's not that it's false, but that the evidence is not clear one way or the other -- it's just speculation at the moment. We do know that programs like ELIZA, crude as they were, made many people feel that something worthwhile was taking place. In one case, a test subject asked Weizenbaum (ELIZA's originator) to leave the room so she could have a private conversation with the therapist.