2 ms·
Well, given that they presented this advantage as an incentive to buy a home, there better be an uproar. Many people based their decision to spend a huge amount
by waps 12y ago
Well, given that they presented this advantage as an incentive to buy a home, there better be an uproar. Many people based their decision to spend a huge amount of money on the presence of this benefit.
And of course, what the government won't do is give them a second stab at that decision after they cancelled their end of the deal. Especially since making this decision will cause a massive drop in home prices as well, so there's very good reasons for most people to want out.
The second reason is that removing this entitlement will, for a huge number of people, effectively be a tax increase of 20, maybe even 30%. Since most people also have a discretionary spending budget of about 15% of their income, this will effectively mean they go bankrupt (selling the house won't work as it'll drop -a lot- in value as a result of the repeal of this credit).
There is no way the banking sector can absorb a 5% drop in house prices, and this policy sounds like it'll drop them by maybe even 50%.
So no, you can't repeal this without an uproar. There are very valid reasons for these people to feel entitled.
- dllthomas 12y agoYou could phase it out, with some combination of grandfathering existing homeowners and gradually decreasing caps on the benefit or percentage of your interest that applies.
- eastbayjake 12y agoI think your assumption about the tax increase is way off. The deduction is for the _interest_ paid on a mortgage. Let's assume you buy a $400,000 home with 20% down and a 30-year loan with a 4.5% interest rate. Because it's a deduction -- not a tax credit -- your savings in the first year is only about $6600, and that savings decreases every year after that as interest becomes a decreasing portion of each payment. I don't think people are going to avoid homeownership in droves because of $6600 per year -- especially people who are in the financial position to own a home. It would, however, remove some of the perverse incentives that make people buy homes who might otherwise be happy to rent one.