3 ms·
You've constructed your argument in such a way that is both inarguable, and non-actionable. Yes, it's true that with sufficient patience, attention to detail,
by defen 12y ago
You've constructed your argument in such a way that is both inarguable, and non-actionable. Yes, it's true that with sufficient patience, attention to detail, time, and money, you can write sophisticated, secure software in C.
However, in the real world, it turns out that programmers are "lazy" (which is a pretty condescending way to describe it, btw). It's a fact that programmers using C have been responsible for millions, if not billions of dollars in economic losses due to simple buffer overflows, integer overflows, use after free, etc. So is the solution to come up with something better than C, or is it to just tell people to stop being lazy and hope they stop producing these bugs?
- Nursie 12y agoThe solution would be to stop hiring incompetents who shouldn't be allowed near a line of BASIC let alone anything else, from being allowed anywhere near sensitive code, regardless of language.