>If the company can prove that the shifts were assigned using an algorithm and not by a person, they have a good chance of winning their case This is wrong. An

>If the company can prove that the shifts were assigned using an algorithm and not by a person, they have a good chance of winning their case This is wrong. An action can be ruled discriminatory even if the intent wasn't such. Though if it is considered "vital" to the survival of the business there can be exceptions. But honestly, companies with only white collar workers face downtime too, but the employees still get paid