"It goes on to argue that nuclear deterrence is not effective and that nuclear weapons should be eliminated for a host of political, military, humanitarian, and

"It goes on to argue that nuclear deterrence is not effective and that nuclear weapons should be eliminated for a host of political, military, humanitarian, and environmental reasons." Not having read the actual(and now classified) article by Doyle, can anyone summarize the "political, military, humanitarian, and environmental reasons"? EDIT: Whoops here's the original article: http://www.iiss.org/en/publications/survival/sections/2013-94b0/survival--global-politics-and-strategy-february-march-2013-3db7/55-1-02-doyle-a88b http://www.iiss.org/en/publications/survival/sections/2013-9...