> "the misconception that "native advertising" is "advertiser paid to publish their PR copy disguised as an article"" I follow Noah Webster's reasoning here: u

> "the misconception that "native advertising" is "advertiser paid to publish their PR copy disguised as an article"" I follow Noah Webster's reasoning here: usage is meaning. Language follows "the same republican principles as American civil and ecclesiastical constitutions". And the term "native advertising", in common usage, refers to PR copy disguised as an article. If you're doing something different, great! Come up with a name to distinguish it from the other stuff.