2 ms·
Good catch! We actually completely developed AirDispatch without realizing that it had many of the same tenants as IM2000. I haven't seen any IM2000 implementa
by huntaub 12y ago
Good catch! We actually completely developed AirDispatch without realizing that it had many of the same tenants as IM2000.
I haven't seen any IM2000 implementations, so I'd love to check it out if you know of any.
Do you not like IM2000, or have other feelings towards it? I'd love to hear your feedback.
- jfb 12y agoAny reticence to mention it is likely due to the fact that djb is a bit of a polarizing personality.
- huntaub 12y agoI figured it had to do with something like that. However, do you or inopinatus have any thoughts on the system as a whole?
- inopinatus 12y agoI think it is an interesting idea that has yet to gain traction, let alone interoperable implementations, possibly due to the cantankerous origins. May have difficulty penetrating the enterprise, where control of policy trumps most other considerations. And as with any multi-sided business model, it requires a community segment with unmet needs to provide initial critical mass. I suggest trying to make the protocol less binary and more like a classical line-oriented exchange, it'll improve uptake amongst implementers. And I wish you well; every effort to reinvent email deserves a red hot go.