it seems to me that calling this an "internet fast lane" is a false equivalency. my understanding was that the internet fast lane concept was something that use

it seems to me that calling this an "internet fast lane" is a false equivalency. my understanding was that the internet fast lane concept was something that users would pay more to use, which leaves the isps free to render the "regular lane" unusable so as to bump the pricing. additionally, there was the whole notion of the "bundles" of websites available at different cost tiering. openconnect appears, at least to me, like it's a collaboration between providers of different services to enhance the value for their shared customers. edit: directed at both mmalone and condiment