> Flynn still needs to do a much better job on the documentation front. It's entirely unclear how to use Flynn. Yes. I mean nothing bad about the people behind

> Flynn still needs to do a much better job on the documentation front. It's entirely unclear how to use Flynn. Yes. I mean nothing bad about the people behind it in saying this, but this is kind of a red flag to me for this kind of project - ie: when you're talking about basic infrastructure I look to see that the people behind it have a culture of continuous and rigorous documentation. Features shouldn't be allowed to be released in any form unless the documentation for them is included. If the product is as far along as it claims to be (a beta available), yet there is still almost zero documentation (at least, as evidenced on their site), then it's in a seriously bad situation. I'd urge them to do some reflection about this and institute some policies that ensure that documentation is emerging as a natural part of their process and not an afterthought that they plan to address later.