3 ms·
So is the "every other Windows is good" rule remaining true? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4415403 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4415403 / http://
by chrisan 12y ago
So is the "every other Windows is good" rule remaining true? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4415403 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4415403 / http://i.imgur.com/hVhvEhr.jpg http://i.imgur.com/hVhvEhr.jpg
I've held back on win8 initially. I was going to try 8.1 once I found free time but now I feel like waiting for the beta of 9
- UnoriginalGuy 12y agoConsidering you didn't list Windows 98 SE (which was a stand-alone release) and called Windows 95 "shit" (which is laughable if you were around in 1995 when relatively speaking it was far from "shit," pretty groundbreaking frankly), no. There is no pattern, people just alter history because they want there to be a pattern. We also have to ignore NT4, 2000, and the servers also.
- chrisan 12y agoNot my graphic, however I agree with it as I used to be on the student helpdesk at college when we had to support 3.1, 95, and 98. Naturally our individual call center team's experience is an insignificant sample size. I don't think anyone believes it is actually every other exact release (hence the original quotes), but the feeling/humor is shared. Sorry you disagree.