3 ms·
The judge crossed out the 'with' and wrote in 'without' prejudice on the note. Does that mean that if the troll tries this on with someone else, this case can'
by keithpeter 12y ago
The judge crossed out the 'with' and wrote in 'without' prejudice on the note.
Does that mean that if the troll tries this on with someone else, this case can't be cited? Just wondering.
- toong 12y agoI guess not: the troll dropped the case, there was no judicial decision, so there is nothing to cite ?
- lutusp 12y agoNo, in general the with/without prejudice language in legal rulings means that a reshaped and resubmitted case on the same issues wouldn't/would be welcomed back for another hearing.