4 ms·
At the time, the problem was that most reviewers couldn't understand the code that produced the result, so they felt that they were accepting a result they coul
by lutusp 12y ago
At the time, the problem was that most reviewers couldn't understand the code that produced the result, so they felt that they were accepting a result they couldn't meaningfully review or independently confirm.
A lesser issue was philosophical -- it didn't seem like mathematics was "supposed" to be conducted. This second issue has pretty much evaporated in the intervening years.