3 ms·
This is very similar to Doug Lenat's work on Automated Mathematician & later on Eurisko, and later Ken Haase's follow up work on representation languages. http
by fiatmoney 12y ago
This is very similar to Doug Lenat's work on Automated Mathematician & later on Eurisko, and later Ken Haase's follow up work on representation languages.
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA155378 http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=ht...
There were severe sticking points around the cultivation of an idea of "interesting" properties and the performance issues around evaluating a combinatoric space of possible manipulations. There hasn't been serious work along those lines since the early 90s or so.
It's annoying because especially Haase's work has some very practical insights, but Wolfram seems to be loathe to ever admit he's building off of someone else's work.
- mjn 12y agoYes! I wish there was more work in that line. Very interesting work, but also hit some major problems. This 1984 postmortem paper by Lenat and a collaborator is also thought-provoking: http://eksl.isi.edu/files/library/Lenat_Brown-1984-why-AM-and-EURISKO-work.pdf http://eksl.isi.edu/files/library/Lenat_Brown-1984-why-AM-an...