NANOG[0] warned about it in May, and there is a blog post [1] that expands on the risk. Cisco 6500/7600 (if they are set to hold the complete BGP table) are kno

NANOG[0] warned about it in May, and there is a blog post [1] that expands on the risk. Cisco 6500/7600 (if they are set to hold the complete BGP table) are known to be affected. [0] http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-May/066880.html http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-May/066880.htm... [1] http://packetlife.net/blog/2014/may/6/global-ipv4-routing-table-hits-500k-routes/ http://packetlife.net/blog/2014/may/6/global-ipv4-routing-ta...