3 ms·
I guess this would need to be more structured than person-to-person chat (eg, the top voted response at 1400 today will be submitted as our response, or possibl
by JacobAldridge 17y ago
I guess this would need to be more structured than person-to-person chat (eg, the top voted response at 1400 today will be submitted as our response, or possible responses must be submitted by 1345 so that all have a fair chance of being read and voted upon). Times could be more regular depending on the desired speed of chat.
I'm not clear on why people would participate in this sort of thing, but I think that's probably because of the Reddit - Digg example.
I imagine a crowd-to-crowd chat between, say, the Skeptics Society and the Answers in Genesis community, or supporters of various Health Care proposals might be interesting to follow.
- amichail 17y agoThe Reddit - Digg example is poor. I changed it.