3 ms·
This is beyond a technology problem. For example, even with encryption everywhere we leak metadata about ourselves. Recent discussions here and elsewhere have s
by josho 12y ago
This is beyond a technology problem. For example, even with encryption everywhere we leak metadata about ourselves. Recent discussions here and elsewhere have shown the value of metadata.
Further, at some point data needs to be decrypted for it to be used, so we still need to wrestle with who has the final say over what is allowed with that data, and what are the consequences when the data isn't handled correctly. Currently, most of the rules are governed by companies and consumers have little say over their own information. We've only started to see abuses of this today (e.g. Target as the article references), but the potential for abuse is only growing as we see companies discover new value of their databases.
- chrisfosterelli 12y agoThe usefulness of encryption almost always depends on who holds the keys. Yes, it has to be decrypted at some point, but when it's only the user then it's much less of a problem. I see what you're saying though -- it's not an easy problem to solve. Maybe some combination of legislation, technology, and user awareness is the solution, but I fail to come up with any scenarios where sole government regulation has ever helped.
- tormeh 12y agoIn tech? Maybe you're right. In society in general? That's a crazy statement. I think we just need to wait for the technology-illiterate politicians to die out. It's a known problem that consensus based progress is constrained by the human lifespan.
- chrisfosterelli 12y agoYes, sorry I should have clarified I was referring specifically to legislature surrounding tech. I agree, many of the people who make legislation for tech barely understand how to use a computer in the first place and rely on crappy metaphors and explanations from other people. A more technology-literate set of politicians would help hugely.