3 ms·
It's hard to find a lot of hard data on either plane, but the 787 has been stated as being 20% more efficient than the 767, and the A380 has been stated as havi
by Sanddancer 12y ago
It's hard to find a lot of hard data on either plane, but the 787 has been stated as being 20% more efficient than the 767, and the A380 has been stated as having a per passenger fuel consumption of 81 passenger miles per gallon. So, using the figures I found on wiki [1], it looks like the 787 is fairly considerably, as in using ~75% of the fuel, more efficient than the 787. The A380 may be a big plane, but it's a fairly conventional plane, all things considered. I imagine that if there were a revamp of it with more carbon fiber usage, it could get a lot more interesting.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_aircraft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_aircraft
- ulfw 12y agoIf Airbus NEO's the engines with Rolls Royce Advance and stretches the frame to a possible A380-900 I'd venture a guess and say that gap could be closed, especially on a CASM basis. Provided they keep the production facilities rolling until such a change might happen in the 2020s.