3 ms·
They implemented WebGL in IE, so sitting this out would just leave them having to implement a standard without input into the process. Also, for old monopolist
by twotwotwo 12y ago
They implemented WebGL in IE, so sitting this out would just leave them having to implement a standard without input into the process.
Also, for old monopolist Microsoft, standards were a bane because they meant smaller players could interoperate with its software, and even sometimes influence its future via standards committees. For new underdog-in-certain-markets Microsoft, standards are a blessing because it means they can interoperate with larger players' software, and even sometimes influence its future via standards committees. I'm not sure how much that's taken hold culturally within MS, though. (And, of course, there are many places they're still not the underdog.)
- dlitz 12y agoI doubt there's really a "new" Microsoft. They're just in the "Embrace" phase of their usual 3-step process.
- CmonDev 12y agoIt is a new Microsoft, unfortunately. They are pushing stupid HTML5 everywhere :(. Might even make Dynamics AX use it.
- JonoW 12y agoThis seems such an old fashioned outlook now. MS doesn't have, and probably will never again have, a monopoly on the browser environment; they have no choice but to be good web citizens.
- pjmlp 12y agoJust like the old Apple before they got "acquired" by NeXT.