3 ms·
Slightly off topic, but I was hoping these were satellite images and not just shaded maps. Also showing 180 individual images seems like an awful way to present
by Tiksi 12y ago
Slightly off topic, but I was hoping these were satellite images and not just shaded maps. Also showing 180 individual images seems like an awful way to present the data, maybe an animation or have a time slider?
Regardless, it's an interesting dataset, and I honestly didn't know that the drought was so severe, having only heard it mentioned in passing.
- woah 12y agohttp://www.latimes.com/la-me-g-california-drought-map-gif-htmlstory.html http://www.latimes.com/la-me-g-california-drought-map-gif-ht...
- Tiksi 12y agoThank You! This definitely helped me visualize it. It's interesting that it seemed to "move" locations over time. At the beginning the hardest hit area was the north eastern part and towards the end it was (is I suppose) the Southern part of the state. Does anyone know a particular reason for this? I'd think that the driest parts would be mostly consistent, but my knowledge in this area is non-existent. Edit: Looking at the article again I see this link is at the bottom of the text, not sure how I missed it the first time around.