You won't make a lot of friends here with this kind of reasoning. Please refute the article in a way that is at least somewhat open to scrutiny from the wider a

You won't make a lot of friends here with this kind of reasoning. Please refute the article in a way that is at least somewhat open to scrutiny from the wider audience. That should at least include concrete examples and preferably sourced rebuttal of said claims. Calling something "pseudo science bullshit" because of "science"... is a lot more similar to pseudoscience than having an actual sourced debate based on concrete examples.