I don't agree with this article. He basically says that highways should not be called a subsidy because he does not feel good about calling them a subsidy. Sorr

I don't agree with this article. He basically says that highways should not be called a subsidy because he does not feel good about calling them a subsidy. Sorry but this is not good reasoning. Then he points out other reasons for suburbanization. Well, these reasons may exist but even so their existence does not prove that the other major reason -- the highway subsidy -- did not exist. In other words, if it wasn't for the highway subsidy the other issues, white flight etc., would not be as big, because only the richer could afford white flight.