As I read the article, the very first chart lies horribly to the reader. Its scale doesn't cover 100%, it's just a zoom over 30-70% and nothing warns against th

As I read the article, the very first chart lies horribly to the reader. Its scale doesn't cover 100%, it's just a zoom over 30-70% and nothing warns against this. And why mere 60% of the workforce is called "so many"? If it was 80%, it could be called that. The article tries to create a problem where I think is none.