3 ms·
Good to see that someone is acting on it. However, the following quote makes me worried about the bureaucracy. (1) set up a non-government board consisting of
by prpon 17y ago
Good to see that someone is acting on it.
However, the following quote makes me worried about the bureaucracy.
(1) set up a non-government board consisting of credible VCs, entrepreneurs, and lawyers to vet applicants.
It probably is a better solution than what PG proposed in his original essay.
"let the market decide. Startup investors work hard to find the best startups. The government could not do better than to piggyback on their expertise, and use investment by recognized startup investors as the test of whether a company was a real startup."
PG's version would eliminate anyone who would bootstrap a startup without external funding. Brad's is a little inclusive.
I would rather prefer to leave it at "let the market decide."
Any interesting ideas as to how you could convert that statement into an actionable policy for immigration authorities to follow?
- jdrock 17y agoI would feel uncomfortable giving recognizable VC firms a competitive advantage in this way. If KP gets to select who gets into the US, chances are they will have a lead on getting to invest in those people. That said, I also don't like the idea of having a non-government board decide.