3 ms·
I don't follow your comment, but I should have been more explicit: gif is a waste of bandwidth compared to a soundless webm
by arcameron 12y ago
I don't follow your comment, but I should have been more explicit:
gif is a waste of bandwidth compared to a soundless webm
- Wilya 12y agoGifs work everywhere. They're heavy, but support is pretty much guaranteed. That's still not the case for webm.
- arcameron 12y agoIf you're OK with screwing over Safari/IE users, you'll have pretty good support. You could engineer a browser-based fallback to gif, but honestly I wouldn't bother. I'd imagine we can create an impetus to support it if we actually used it more
- userbinator 12y ago...and webm is a waste of CPU and memory compared to gif :-) There are always tradeoffs.