4 ms·
My point is that you don't understand your own source. The "links, measurements, graphs" are in the paper you referenced, they just say something different from
by rbehrends 12y ago
My point is that you don't understand your own source. The "links, measurements, graphs" are in the paper you referenced, they just say something different from what you believe they are saying.
If you're struggling with understanding the paper, there's really nothing more I can do to help.
- acqq 12y agoApart from the claim that I use "fuzzy" words or that my set of "most GCs" unsurprisingly doesn't include the kind that Go still doesn't have and probably won't have for some years more, what have I written that you actually refuted?