> In any event, you are severely underestimating the federal government's general tolerance for "obscenity" and speech that is potentially objectionable. Given

> In any event, you are severely underestimating the federal government's general tolerance for "obscenity" and speech that is potentially objectionable. Given that California passed a law allowing for confiscation of firearms as a result of anonymous tips in response to a diatribe not too dissimilar from the one posted, I'd say that's debatable. That said, I agree that Lyndsy overstated the case that the person would _surely_ be in jail, but it isn't terribly implausible either, depending on the locality.