4 ms·
Does the vulnerability stretch back into any of the BSDs it was forked from? :)
by cturner 17y ago
Does the vulnerability stretch back into any of the BSDs it was forked from? :)
- wglb 17y agoNow that is almost mean.
- cperciva 17y agoAs FreeBSD Security Officer I don't see anything unreasonable about that question -- it's the first thing which occurred to me, too.
- spamizbad 17y agoActually unlike the previous TCP/IP stack I believe the Vista/Win7/Serv2008 stack is new from the ground-up.
- _ck_ 17y agoThey rewrote it so carefully that they duplicated the same teardrop bug they created back in windows 3.1/95 and didn't fix for half a decade.
- cperciva 17y agoGood question -- but I have to say "almost certainly not", for two reasons. First, I haven't had any email from Microsoft about this -- and for all that Microsoft has a reputation for being bad at security and not supporting open source software, they do take their responsibilities seriously when it comes to inter-vendor coordination. Second, the details I've seen relating to this suggest that it relates to connection hashing -- which is relatively new, and thus is unlikely to involve code from the BSD stack which Microsoft imported so many years ago.