3 ms·
Not a bad start. This can be pared down even further: * Adjust search results based on your own clickthrough rates. If you bounce out of a site a few times (h
by ChikkaChiChi 12y ago
Not a bad start.
This can be pared down even further:
* Adjust search results based on your own clickthrough rates. If you bounce out of a site a few times (hello, quora) then it grays out or falls off. Sites you go to and stay on become more prominent.
* Kill downloads. I know this won't be popular, but the ability to download a thing isn't necessary for everyday use. There would be a heightened awareness for the user if they had to switch browsers to download something.
* No cross-site loading of any kind; all source material MUST come from the domain you are on. This would seriously break some sites but it would close large gaps in security and tracking.
A browser just for browsing!
- lemieux 12y ago> No cross-site loading of any kind; all source material MUST come from the domain you are on. This would seriously break some sites but it would close large gaps in security and tracking. This would probably break almost everything. Who doesn't use some sort of a CDN nowadays?
- Zikes 12y agoA better alternative would be to promote the use of Content-Security-Policy, perhaps by requiring it be used in order to load source material from an alternate domain.
- ChikkaChiChi 12y agoYou can still use a CDN through your own domain. It wouldn't be perfect, but it would be something.