4 ms·
I am going to agree with "JasonFruit" here. The company has a much rosier picture of themselves than you do (and who is to say which one is right?). Think of p
by projectramo 12y ago
I am going to agree with "JasonFruit" here.
The company has a much rosier picture of themselves than you do (and who is to say which one is right?). Think of possible mitigating circumstances, first duty to investors, what's right for the company, we made a mistake, etc etc and who knows what else.
You don't want to make enemies, have them hit back in public, etc. This is not about what is "just" but what is efficient to get on with finding a job, and telling everyone about it.
So I do think it would be a mistake to make it a public fight and bring up the name of the company.
- jowiar 12y agoRight now this company has set a standard such that I will refuse to work for any YC-backed startup without serious contractual protection.
- guybrushT 12y agoMy experience (and this discussion) tells me that you should refuse to work for any company without serious contractual protection. Startup or large. YC or non-YC. Its just sensible. I have found a new appreciation for things I used to consider bureaucratic at a large company (I am looking at you - HR department at a large company).