8 ms·
This is a bit of a stretch. Chemtrails are a baseless assumption. EM radiation has a measurable effect matter. Why not make valid points instead of insulting pe
by cookiemonster11 12y ago
This is a bit of a stretch. Chemtrails are a baseless assumption. EM radiation has a measurable effect matter. Why not make valid points instead of insulting people?
- martiuk 12y agoNon-Ionizing radiation means exactly that. http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&Page&HPAwebAutoListName/Page/1199451940308 http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&Page&HPAwebAutoListName/Pa...
- a8da6b0c91d 12y agoNon-ionizing radiation has biological effects. Magnetic fields have biological effects. This is not controversial! Many replicated experiments prove it! I am not going to say Wifi causes cancer because I don't know (doubt it). But this reflexive bleating about non-ionizing radiation needs to stop. Radio waves do not have to break DNA to affect biological tissues. They can alter many important chemical reactions.
- sliverstorm 12y agoYou could say the same thing about a summer breeze. They have biological effects too.
- a8da6b0c91d 12y agoYour point being? I dare say spending most of each day out in a continuous breeze might have some noteworthy effects. Skin disease?
- sliverstorm 12y agoSomething having biological effects proves absolutely nothing. Non-ionizing radiation has biological effects. Magnetic fields have biological effects. This is not controversial! So? Also, if you are worried that spending a lot of time "exposed" to a light breeze is going to give you skin disease, you might want to read about hypochondria because you have it.
- commandar 12y agoNon-ionizing radiation can still be harmful. That said, the power levels emitted by wifi devices are so far below any safe exposure limits that it's laughable.