3 ms·
Agree that Amazebar looks way too cluttered. We are working on something similar at StartHQ (https://starthq.com https://starthq.com) and keeping the search re
by olegp 12y ago
Agree that Amazebar looks way too cluttered.
We are working on something similar at StartHQ (https://starthq.com https://starthq.com) and keeping the search results page simple and uncluttered has been a challenge.
We ended up including more images and less text for certain types of results like contacts, for example. Check out the screenshot below if you don't have time sign up:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zbyrhvzf3f4fmsm/visual-search.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/zbyrhvzf3f4fmsm/visual-search.png
- yiyus 12y agoI don't really see the advantage of displaying images. In your screenshot, we see five typical examples: the black head, the poster in the wall, the unknown face, the baby, and the picture with too many effects. How are these pictures better than printing five names?
- olegp 12y agoYou're right, one still needs to include the name on top of the image - that's something I'm working on atm. We did have just text before and images stick out better, making it much easier and faster to determine which is the right result to click. Text is also quite easy to scan in one direction (top to bottom for search results), but having to scan horizontally as well is difficult. With images it's much easier, letting us include more results in the same space.