4 ms·
Non-SNI over ipv6 seems pretty pointless since anything supporting ipv6 is going to have sni anyway.
by asdfaoeu 12y ago
Non-SNI over ipv6 seems pretty pointless since anything supporting ipv6 is going to have sni anyway.
- otterley 12y agoNot true; Windows XP supports IPv6 but not SNI.
- p1mrx 12y agoWhile that's technically true, XP doesn't enable IPv6 by default, so virtually no one uses it.
- donavanm 12y agoNot sure why otterley was down voted. XP is going to exist for a while. Old android/mobile clients are another case. Mobile operators are moving towards transparent "4 in 6" NAT/encap on their edges. The server would see a layer 3 IPv6 client, while the actual layer 7 client is an old Android/java stack.