vonsydov's link is not dead and I don't know why his comment was downvoted or why I can't reply to it. There's nothing wrong with his link, though this one may

vonsydov's link is not dead and I don't know why his comment was downvoted or why I can't reply to it. There's nothing wrong with his link, though this one may have been slightly better http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1254642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1254642 More broadly, I don't understand why HN seems to prefer press pieces (so often containing more inaccuracies than useful information) to the papers on which they're based. In this case, even if you can't access the full text, the single-paragraph abstract contains all of the new information in the 12-paragraph Tech Review story.