I agree with Kasparov. I've never known a historian who didn't agree that there were major gaps and distortions in historical records. Fomenko may be a radical

I agree with Kasparov. I've never known a historian who didn't agree that there were major gaps and distortions in historical records. Fomenko may be a radical and an outsider, but he does have a very logical approach, which I appreciate. Sometimes it's worthwhile to question everything you assume is correct and reason from available evidence alone. This approach should be celebrated and encouraged, especially when it produces such different and interesting results. If it's wrong, great! We can still learn from it. Many political problems could be solved with a similar approach. There's too much investment in established ways of doing things.