This doesn't have enough info to draw any meaningful conclusions. Other people have already raised potential issues about the sample group. The report glosses o

This doesn't have enough info to draw any meaningful conclusions. Other people have already raised potential issues about the sample group. The report glosses over too many details to be useful. Take the chart on page six as an example. Are all respondents rating the VCs or are people only rating VCs they raised money from? Why was USV left off of the chart when it was in earlier charts? If founders don't care much about mentorship (see chart on page four) why are they bothering to include this chart? Wouldn't it be more useful to compare VCs on a metric founders seem to care about like network or industry knowledge? The x axis is also mislabeled but I don't think that should lead to any confusion in this case.