That's not how I understood it, and not at all how I think he intended it to be read. His statement is that a question that sets "automation means less jobs wh

That's not how I understood it, and not at all how I think he intended it to be read. His statement is that a question that sets "automation means less jobs which is bad!" against "automation means more and better jobs which is good!" is improper. Automation will change the job landscape - that's an objective statement, and we've been living it so far. Whether we make it a positive change and end up with Russell's "idle utopia" or a negative change and end up in some horrific dystopia is entirely up to our response.