31 ms·
I think we're in agreement on content if not tone... and, honestly, I think your tone is probably closer to reasonable while mine was a bit facetious. I said i
by tel 12y ago
I think we're in agreement on content if not tone... and, honestly, I think your tone is probably closer to reasonable while mine was a bit facetious.
I said it that way to emphasize the argument that existence of a referentially transparent semantics isn't enough, though. You need extant and useful.
- AnimalMuppet 12y agoVery true. In fact, that's true of every language feature. Way too often, people waste time bikeshedding about how language X can do Y. But if it can't usefully do it, who cares?