3 ms·
Well, you are correct that fat has been incorrectly vilified. Most of the rest of what you say is logical leaps based on inconclusive data, which is just as ba
by jasallen 12y ago
Well, you are correct that fat has been incorrectly vilified.
Most of the rest of what you say is logical leaps based on inconclusive data, which is just as bad as what the fat haters did years ago.
Don't get me wrong, a lot of what you say is even a good best guess based on what we know right now, but so was fat hating at one time, and stating best guesses like proven fact is what gets us to the point of having entrenched, demonstrably incorrect policy.
Let's just say "currently best available evidence..."
- andy_ppp 12y agoYes I'd agree with everything you have said! Definitely not proven and loads of supposition. However I'd be willing to make a substantial bet that I'm correct. Wait until you hear my crackpot theory that chemotherapy is only as effective as the starvation and reduction in human growth hormone it causes ;-) The thing is though who is going to do a trial comparing controlled calorific intake (say < 600 calories per day for several days per week) with chemotherapy treatments - certainly not drug companies.