4 ms·
Oh, look, FUD. >Microsoft: Proven security development lifecycle >Linux: Security threats? You owe me a new keyboard. This one is full of coffee. Also got t
by blueskin_ 12y ago
Oh, look, FUD.
>Microsoft: Proven security development lifecycle
>Linux: Security threats?
You owe me a new keyboard. This one is full of coffee.
Also got to love the whole "Linux doesn't do AD" BS. If you still live in 2005, perhaps not, but that's about it. You could also argue that AD is a misfeature, given the almost hilarious insecurity of NTLM password hashes, etc.
- pyre 12y agoTechnically they are right. Linux is only a kernel. You need other software to run AD, so they are covered legally! ;-)
- blueskin_ 12y agoAh, the FSF argument. I guess saying GNU/Linux was too wordy for Microsoft anyway, with their whole Metro concept being "having information density and options is bad".