3 ms·
These renderings of a girl look pretty damn realistic to me: http://vimeo.com/40602544 http://vimeo.com/40602544
by thomaseng 12y ago
These renderings of a girl look pretty damn realistic to me: http://vimeo.com/40602544 http://vimeo.com/40602544
- pja 12y agoThose are pictures of an adult, not a child. When you use the word "girl" to describe an adult woman you're implicitly belittling her. Don't be that guy.
- goblin89 12y ago> Those are pictures of an adult, not a child. When you use the word "girl" to describe an adult woman you're implicitly belittling her. Don't be that guy. Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker (so I'm not confident enough to downvote or anything), but your judging this use of “girl” as female version of “boy”, ignoring the overall mode of expression, doesn't seem adequate. I would have no objections if thomaseng's comment was more formal: > I would consider these pictures of a girl quite lifelike But it's not. If I were the author, and the pictures were of a man, I'd totally say “guy”. Once you flip the gender, “guy” seems to become “girl”, not “woman”. (Again, given the overall informal style used.) And as for the word “guy”, it doesn't sound in any way belittling a grown-up man (and you just used it yourself).
- pja 12y agoI would say that the male equivalent of "girl" is "boy", not "guy". The English language is often unhelpful in that exact equivalents of the word you want that exist for one gender don't exist for the other, or else carry other connotations. Master vs Mistress for instance.
- barrkel 12y agoAnd the female equivalent of guy is girl. The word 'girl' genuinely has more shades than the submissive little box you want to put it in.
- nkozyra 12y agoDid tumblr buy HN?
- afro88 12y agoThe are very good. Knowing they're renderings though, you can see it in the face and hair. DanBC made an interesting comment - it would interesting to see renderings like these in a double blind test with photographs and see how well they stack up.