4 ms·
Christ what an asshole! He refers to exposed film as if it hadn't been fucked with -- you can't go back and reprocess it differently (like you can with RAW).
by blasdel 17y ago
Christ what an asshole!
He refers to exposed film as if it hadn't been fucked with -- you can't go back and reprocess it differently (like you can with RAW).
He describes RAW files as being a fixed array of pixels with lossy compression -- that's anything but RAW -- the good formats are the un-demosaiced elements straight from the sensor, and that means that you can do things like rotate the image at subpixel resolution (especially for non-Bayer-filter sensors like the Foveon).
- lurkinggrue 17y agoRockwell is a known troll in photography circles. I don't shoot jpeg since I don't always trust what the how the camera is going to boil the image down and would like option of going a different direction later. Raw just gives you a bit more latitude than jpeg and a hell of allot less hassle than film.