I think you're right, the headcount reduction number would most likely be conservative. But what I can imagine is that the overhead of administering multiple pr

I think you're right, the headcount reduction number would most likely be conservative. But what I can imagine is that the overhead of administering multiple programs (some overlapping) is larger then just the salary and benefits costs. Something like a more wood behind fewer arrows ... applied to government. I'd like to see somebody else run the numbers on the "overhead" like a group of independent economist (eg. not me).