It's cool that the MIST gets around average human interrogators' variations and weaknesses. But what about the weaknesses of the human or algorithm that generat

It's cool that the MIST gets around average human interrogators' variations and weaknesses. But what about the weaknesses of the human or algorithm that generates the MIST questions? Plus the MIST has no opportunities for followup questions. Turing's intent was to define a sufficient condition for labeling behavior "intelligent", and I think a high score on Loebner's setup with a competent interrogator does this better than a pre-defined set of MIST questions.