3 ms·
The second story you link to was also covered in the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/nov/10/india.international http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/
by yangyang 17y ago
The second story you link to was also covered in the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/nov/10/india.international http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/nov/10/india.internatio...
The third was covered in the Independent, a (former) broadsheet which I think most would consider as respectable as the Guardian: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/belief-and-the-brains-god-spot-1641022.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/belief-and-the-bra...
[edit] And the first story was covered in the Telegraph, another broadsheet: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2238138/Faceless-figures-cause-a-stir-at-Wimbledon-Harrods-and-Elton-Johns-ball.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2238...
The news in the Mail might be a bit hyped but it's not "wildly inaccurate". I don't read it either, and wouldn't, but it's not exactly The Daily Sport.
- jacquesm 17y agore. the second story: Indeed, but the pictures were left out. Maybe someone had that rare quality called tact ?
- yangyang 17y agoTact has nothing to do with accuracy, which was what you were commenting on. Tabloids by their nature print many more photos.
- jacquesm 17y agoJust in case: http://www.dollymix.tv/2008/05/how_the_daily_mail_misrepresen.html http://www.dollymix.tv/2008/05/how_the_daily_mail_misreprese... http://5cc.blogspot.com/2007/05/how-daily-mail-lies-about-immigration_25.html http://5cc.blogspot.com/2007/05/how-daily-mail-lies-about-im... Of course, now you can say that's just two examples, and then I can go back and find another 10, and so on.