3 ms·
Except, these agencies are quick to retroactively redefine terms. Maybe data isn't "seized" until you classify it as evidence. And if all else fails, "think of
by rudimentary 12y ago
Except, these agencies are quick to retroactively redefine terms. Maybe data isn't "seized" until you classify it as evidence.
And if all else fails, "think of the children" usually works.
- higherpurpose 12y agoThat argument should never hold in a Court. I'm still hoping one of these surveillance cases goes to the Supreme Court.
- fnordfnordfnord 12y agoThe trick is to shop around for the most loathsome defendants you can find until you get a precedent established, then you can expand the technique's use more broadly.