If he continues his case, all he can get is lawyers fees and a judgement that he does not violate the patent. It doesn't say anything about the actual patent i

If he continues his case, all he can get is lawyers fees and a judgement that he does not violate the patent. It doesn't say anything about the actual patent itself. The EFF approach solves the problem for everyone by having the patent office void the patent due to prior art claims. Adam's approach inflicts financial pain on the patent holder.