3 ms·
"- prevent damage to Australia's international relations that may be caused by the publication of material that may damage the reputations of specified individu
by vithlani 12y ago
"- prevent damage to Australia's international relations that may be caused by the publication of material that may damage the reputations of specified individuals who are not the subject of charges in these proceedings. These orders are made on the grounds that they are:
- necessary to prevent a real and substantial risk of prejudice to the proper administration of justice that cannot be prevented by other reasonably available means; and
- necessary to prevent prejudice to the interests of the Commonwealth in relation to national security. "
What a load of crap. Now that WikiLeaks has actually published the information in the public domain, pray what:
1. Damage has been done to Australia's international reputation?
2. What national security has been affected?
3. What justice has been prevented from being administered? All the Aussies involved in the case will be punished as they are Aussie, all the foreign nationals cannot be touched anyways because they are foreign.
This court order is simply about protecting Australian commercial interests as well as trying to shield the RBA. Securency and its subsidiaries bring in considerable amount of recurring income. Why reveal it's mod op?