3 ms·
The difference is that no one is going to start searching for "Dave consulting". A lot of people run sites and businesses with "Drupal" in the name. For the la
by chaosmachine 17y ago
The difference is that no one is going to start searching for "Dave consulting".
A lot of people run sites and businesses with "Drupal" in the name. For the last 8 years, nobody's had to worry about licensing issues. Now things seem to be changing, and it's not really clear why.
- billpg 17y agoIf I'm reading this right, "Dave does Drupal" is allowed.
- jacquesm 17y agoread again: A high-traffic website "drupalindepth.com" containing sponsored ads, qualifies for an automatic license when the profits generated from these ads (minus hosting costs and other obvious costs incurred for maintaining the website) are used to pay a full-time developer working on the new open source Drupal template engine. And: Example uses for which the license grant procedure must be followed: * a commercial website hosted under domain name "commonusesofdrupal.com";
- dmitrig01 17y agoThere's a difference. If you see the URL drupalindepth.com or commonusesofdrupal.com, you obviously should think "hey, this is about the Drupal software blah blah blah", while if you see davedoesdrupal.com, you should think "This is about what dave does with drupal", not "what drupal does in general". The first is allowed, the second isn't unless you have a license. [Edit: IANAL]